A comparison of British Library CIP and CIP Revised records

Alan Seal, C Mary Overton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Changes made to data elements in UK CIP records when compared with corresponding CIP Revised records were analysed. A sample of 562 titles acquired between January 1980 and January 1982 by a random sample of public and academic libraries was used. The CIP Revised record on BLAISE was compared with the original CIP entry which appeared in the British National Bibliography. Items of information most likely to be amended were Dewey classification number, year of publication, form of heading and name added entries. Some 28 per cent of titles were affected by one or more possibly important changes.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)199-210
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Librarianship
Volume16
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1984

Fingerprint

National Bibliographies
Libraries
Names
Publications

Cite this

A comparison of British Library CIP and CIP Revised records. / Seal, Alan; Overton, C Mary.

In: Journal of Librarianship, Vol. 16, No. 3, 1984, p. 199-210.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Seal, Alan ; Overton, C Mary. / A comparison of British Library CIP and CIP Revised records. In: Journal of Librarianship. 1984 ; Vol. 16, No. 3. pp. 199-210.
@article{c30389a5d93d432991ce27b60194fb1d,
title = "A comparison of British Library CIP and CIP Revised records",
abstract = "Changes made to data elements in UK CIP records when compared with corresponding CIP Revised records were analysed. A sample of 562 titles acquired between January 1980 and January 1982 by a random sample of public and academic libraries was used. The CIP Revised record on BLAISE was compared with the original CIP entry which appeared in the British National Bibliography. Items of information most likely to be amended were Dewey classification number, year of publication, form of heading and name added entries. Some 28 per cent of titles were affected by one or more possibly important changes.",
author = "Alan Seal and Overton, {C Mary}",
year = "1984",
doi = "10.1177/096100068401600304",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "199--210",
journal = "Journal of Librarianship",
issn = "0022-2232",
publisher = "Library Association",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of British Library CIP and CIP Revised records

AU - Seal, Alan

AU - Overton, C Mary

PY - 1984

Y1 - 1984

N2 - Changes made to data elements in UK CIP records when compared with corresponding CIP Revised records were analysed. A sample of 562 titles acquired between January 1980 and January 1982 by a random sample of public and academic libraries was used. The CIP Revised record on BLAISE was compared with the original CIP entry which appeared in the British National Bibliography. Items of information most likely to be amended were Dewey classification number, year of publication, form of heading and name added entries. Some 28 per cent of titles were affected by one or more possibly important changes.

AB - Changes made to data elements in UK CIP records when compared with corresponding CIP Revised records were analysed. A sample of 562 titles acquired between January 1980 and January 1982 by a random sample of public and academic libraries was used. The CIP Revised record on BLAISE was compared with the original CIP entry which appeared in the British National Bibliography. Items of information most likely to be amended were Dewey classification number, year of publication, form of heading and name added entries. Some 28 per cent of titles were affected by one or more possibly important changes.

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/096100068401600304

U2 - 10.1177/096100068401600304

DO - 10.1177/096100068401600304

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 199

EP - 210

JO - Journal of Librarianship

JF - Journal of Librarianship

SN - 0022-2232

IS - 3

ER -