A comparison of adults' and children's metacognition for yes/no recognition decisions

R.M. Hiller, N. Weber

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Basic metacognitive development research suggests that metacognitive abilities develop before adolescence. However, this research has not used tasks that require the discrimination of seen from unseen stimuli, an important element of real-world recognition tasks such as eyewitness identification. We tested the idea that children would be less able to monitor and control the accuracy of their memories in such a task. We used a word-pair recognition task to compare children's (109 8-12 year olds) and adult's (102 first-year psychology students) ability to adaptively make, monitor, and control the reporting of yes/no recognition decisions about familiar stimuli in a task with no demand effects. We found that adults were substantially better at discriminating old from new stimuli, but no evidence of an age difference in metacognitive ability. Although these results do not explain children's poor metacognition in eyewitness identification, they suggest potential steps to improve children's identification performance.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)185-191
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition
Volume2
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sep 2013

Fingerprint

Aptitude
Research
Students
Psychology
Recognition (Psychology)
Metacognition

Cite this

A comparison of adults' and children's metacognition for yes/no recognition decisions. / Hiller, R.M.; Weber, N.

In: Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, Vol. 2, No. 3, 01.09.2013, p. 185-191.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{43bb2cf99f814a578730004b67909843,
title = "A comparison of adults' and children's metacognition for yes/no recognition decisions",
abstract = "Basic metacognitive development research suggests that metacognitive abilities develop before adolescence. However, this research has not used tasks that require the discrimination of seen from unseen stimuli, an important element of real-world recognition tasks such as eyewitness identification. We tested the idea that children would be less able to monitor and control the accuracy of their memories in such a task. We used a word-pair recognition task to compare children's (109 8-12 year olds) and adult's (102 first-year psychology students) ability to adaptively make, monitor, and control the reporting of yes/no recognition decisions about familiar stimuli in a task with no demand effects. We found that adults were substantially better at discriminating old from new stimuli, but no evidence of an age difference in metacognitive ability. Although these results do not explain children's poor metacognition in eyewitness identification, they suggest potential steps to improve children's identification performance.",
author = "R.M. Hiller and N. Weber",
year = "2013",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jarmac.2013.07.001",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
pages = "185--191",
journal = "Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition",
issn = "2211-3681",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of adults' and children's metacognition for yes/no recognition decisions

AU - Hiller, R.M.

AU - Weber, N.

PY - 2013/9/1

Y1 - 2013/9/1

N2 - Basic metacognitive development research suggests that metacognitive abilities develop before adolescence. However, this research has not used tasks that require the discrimination of seen from unseen stimuli, an important element of real-world recognition tasks such as eyewitness identification. We tested the idea that children would be less able to monitor and control the accuracy of their memories in such a task. We used a word-pair recognition task to compare children's (109 8-12 year olds) and adult's (102 first-year psychology students) ability to adaptively make, monitor, and control the reporting of yes/no recognition decisions about familiar stimuli in a task with no demand effects. We found that adults were substantially better at discriminating old from new stimuli, but no evidence of an age difference in metacognitive ability. Although these results do not explain children's poor metacognition in eyewitness identification, they suggest potential steps to improve children's identification performance.

AB - Basic metacognitive development research suggests that metacognitive abilities develop before adolescence. However, this research has not used tasks that require the discrimination of seen from unseen stimuli, an important element of real-world recognition tasks such as eyewitness identification. We tested the idea that children would be less able to monitor and control the accuracy of their memories in such a task. We used a word-pair recognition task to compare children's (109 8-12 year olds) and adult's (102 first-year psychology students) ability to adaptively make, monitor, and control the reporting of yes/no recognition decisions about familiar stimuli in a task with no demand effects. We found that adults were substantially better at discriminating old from new stimuli, but no evidence of an age difference in metacognitive ability. Although these results do not explain children's poor metacognition in eyewitness identification, they suggest potential steps to improve children's identification performance.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84883756798&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2013.07.001

U2 - 10.1016/j.jarmac.2013.07.001

DO - 10.1016/j.jarmac.2013.07.001

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84883756798

VL - 2

SP - 185

EP - 191

JO - Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition

JF - Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition

SN - 2211-3681

IS - 3

ER -