A COMPARISON OF 20-HZ FIN WHALE CALL DETECTORS

Shaula Garibbo; Philippe Blondel; Gary Heald; Alan Hunter; Duncan Williams

A COMPARISON OF 20-HZ FIN WHALE CALL DETECTORS

Shaula Garibbo, Philippe Blondel, Gary Heald, Alan Hunter, Duncan Williams

Research output: Chapter or section in a book/report/conference proceeding › Chapter in a published conference proceeding

165 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The benefit of passive acoustic monitoring is indisputable; it is non-invasive to marine life and can capture vast quantities of data over large stretches of space and time. The limiting factor of analysing large volumes of data quickly overwhelms the analyst, and by utilising some form of automatic signal identification this process can be substantially faster. Here we compare the performance of a deep learning detector, simple correlation, and a more traditional energy detector (or the fin whale index). Here we compare three detectors on data from the Lofoten-Vesterålen Observatory in Norway (northern Atlantic Ocean), and the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban-Treaty Organisations hydrophone station at Ascension Island (southern Atlantic Ocean).

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Proceedings of the 29th International Congress on Sound and Vibration, ICSV 2023
Editors	Eleonora Carletti
Publisher	Society of Acoustics
Number of pages	7
ISBN (Electronic)	9788011034238
Publication status	Published - 13 Jul 2023
Event	29th International Congress on Sound and Vibration, ICSV 2023 - Prague, Czech Republic Duration: 9 Jul 2023 → 13 Jul 2023

Publication series

Name	Proceedings of the International Congress on Sound and Vibration
ISSN (Electronic)	2329-3675

Conference

Conference	29th International Congress on Sound and Vibration, ICSV 2023
Country/Territory	Czech Republic
City	Prague
Period	9/07/23 → 13/07/23

Funding

Firstly, we would like to acknowledge R. Heyburn (AWE, UK) for thorough discussions and invaluable scientific input to this paper. This research is supported by the UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC), as part of industrial Cooperative Award in Science and Technology (iCASE) project #2279119, supported by Defence Science & Technology Laboratory (Dstl) and AWE Forensic Seismology. © 2023 British Crown Owned Copyright/Dstl. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Keywords

detectors
long-term measurements
marine acoustics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Acoustics and Ultrasonics

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

ICSV_v3Accepted author manuscript, 1 MB

Cite this

A COMPARISON OF 20-HZ FIN WHALE CALL DETECTORS. / Garibbo, Shaula; Blondel, Philippe; Heald, Gary et al.
Proceedings of the 29th International Congress on Sound and Vibration, ICSV 2023. ed. / Eleonora Carletti. Society of Acoustics, 2023. (Proceedings of the International Congress on Sound and Vibration).

Research output: Chapter or section in a book/report/conference proceeding › Chapter in a published conference proceeding

Garibbo, S, Blondel, P, Heald, G, Hunter, A & Williams, D 2023, A COMPARISON OF 20-HZ FIN WHALE CALL DETECTORS. in E Carletti (ed.), Proceedings of the 29th International Congress on Sound and Vibration, ICSV 2023. Proceedings of the International Congress on Sound and Vibration, Society of Acoustics, 29th International Congress on Sound and Vibration, ICSV 2023, Prague, Czech Republic, 9/07/23.

@inproceedings{fd835c41f67f4a509848fa8eddd39c08,

title = "A COMPARISON OF 20-HZ FIN WHALE CALL DETECTORS",

abstract = "The benefit of passive acoustic monitoring is indisputable; it is non-invasive to marine life and can capture vast quantities of data over large stretches of space and time. The limiting factor of analysing large volumes of data quickly overwhelms the analyst, and by utilising some form of automatic signal identification this process can be substantially faster. Here we compare the performance of a deep learning detector, simple correlation, and a more traditional energy detector (or the fin whale index). Here we compare three detectors on data from the Lofoten-Vester{\aa}len Observatory in Norway (northern Atlantic Ocean), and the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban-Treaty Organisations hydrophone station at Ascension Island (southern Atlantic Ocean).",

keywords = "detectors, long-term measurements, marine acoustics",

author = "Shaula Garibbo and Philippe Blondel and Gary Heald and Alan Hunter and Duncan Williams",

year = "2023",

month = jul,

day = "13",

language = "English",

series = "Proceedings of the International Congress on Sound and Vibration",

publisher = "Society of Acoustics",

editor = "Eleonora Carletti",

booktitle = "Proceedings of the 29th International Congress on Sound and Vibration, ICSV 2023",

note = "29th International Congress on Sound and Vibration, ICSV 2023 ; Conference date: 09-07-2023 Through 13-07-2023",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - A COMPARISON OF 20-HZ FIN WHALE CALL DETECTORS

AU - Garibbo, Shaula

AU - Blondel, Philippe

AU - Heald, Gary

AU - Hunter, Alan

AU - Williams, Duncan

PY - 2023/7/13

Y1 - 2023/7/13

N2 - The benefit of passive acoustic monitoring is indisputable; it is non-invasive to marine life and can capture vast quantities of data over large stretches of space and time. The limiting factor of analysing large volumes of data quickly overwhelms the analyst, and by utilising some form of automatic signal identification this process can be substantially faster. Here we compare the performance of a deep learning detector, simple correlation, and a more traditional energy detector (or the fin whale index). Here we compare three detectors on data from the Lofoten-Vesterålen Observatory in Norway (northern Atlantic Ocean), and the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban-Treaty Organisations hydrophone station at Ascension Island (southern Atlantic Ocean).

AB - The benefit of passive acoustic monitoring is indisputable; it is non-invasive to marine life and can capture vast quantities of data over large stretches of space and time. The limiting factor of analysing large volumes of data quickly overwhelms the analyst, and by utilising some form of automatic signal identification this process can be substantially faster. Here we compare the performance of a deep learning detector, simple correlation, and a more traditional energy detector (or the fin whale index). Here we compare three detectors on data from the Lofoten-Vesterålen Observatory in Norway (northern Atlantic Ocean), and the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban-Treaty Organisations hydrophone station at Ascension Island (southern Atlantic Ocean).

KW - detectors

KW - long-term measurements

KW - marine acoustics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85170648652&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Chapter in a published conference proceeding

AN - SCOPUS:85170648652

T3 - Proceedings of the International Congress on Sound and Vibration

BT - Proceedings of the 29th International Congress on Sound and Vibration, ICSV 2023

A2 - Carletti, Eleonora

PB - Society of Acoustics

T2 - 29th International Congress on Sound and Vibration, ICSV 2023

Y2 - 9 July 2023 through 13 July 2023

ER -

A COMPARISON OF 20-HZ FIN WHALE CALL DETECTORS

Abstract

Publication series

Conference

Funding

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this