A case for critical realism in the pursuit of interdisciplinarity and impact

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In recent years, much social scientific scholarship in sport, exercise and health (SEH) has repudiated (post) positivist research and has instead persuasively argued in favour of qualitative research from constructivist–interpretivist paradigmatic approaches. While this scholarship has enriched the field in numerous ways, this paper contends that constructivist–interpretivist assumptions elicit a modus operandi which is inimical to the accomplishment of two associated contemporary research agendas: interdisciplinarity and impact. In seeking an alternative philosophy of science, the purpose of this paper is to explore how critical realism–meta-theoretical position that has been somewhat absent to date in SEH research–might offer qualitative researchers a new conceptual framework with which greater interdisciplinarity and impact can be achieved. Two main critical realist claims are introduced: (1) the epistemic fallacy can be avoided by adopting a stratified ontology and judgemental rationality, and (2) social science would benefit from seeking causal explanations underpinned by a transformational model of social activity. By de-coupling interpretive epistemologies from constructivist ontologies, it is argued that critical realism permits greater methodological plurality and hence can help transcend persistent paradigmatic boundaries. Indeed, by adopting a realist social ontology and complex, emergent conception of causality, this paper suggests that critical realism permits and encourages impact by asking researchers to focus on explaining the enduring social relations that produce real-world problems. The paper concludes by pointing out the limitations of critical realism and highlighting other ways that interdisciplinarity and impact can similarly be achieved.

LanguageEnglish
Pages525-542
Number of pages18
JournalQualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health
Volume10
Issue number5
Early online date8 May 2018
DOIs
StatusE-pub ahead of print - 8 May 2018

Fingerprint

interdisciplinarity
realism
ontology
Research
Sports
Research Personnel
Nimodipine
Social Sciences
philosophy of science
Health
health
causality
Causality
epistemology
rationality
social science

Keywords

  • Qualitative
  • critical realism
  • impact
  • interdisciplinarity
  • methodology
  • ontology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Health(social science)
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

A case for critical realism in the pursuit of interdisciplinarity and impact. / Wiltshire, Gareth.

In: Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, Vol. 10, No. 5, 08.05.2018, p. 525-542.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{314339c878674f3a8f6f16472601376e,
title = "A case for critical realism in the pursuit of interdisciplinarity and impact",
abstract = "In recent years, much social scientific scholarship in sport, exercise and health (SEH) has repudiated (post) positivist research and has instead persuasively argued in favour of qualitative research from constructivist–interpretivist paradigmatic approaches. While this scholarship has enriched the field in numerous ways, this paper contends that constructivist–interpretivist assumptions elicit a modus operandi which is inimical to the accomplishment of two associated contemporary research agendas: interdisciplinarity and impact. In seeking an alternative philosophy of science, the purpose of this paper is to explore how critical realism–meta-theoretical position that has been somewhat absent to date in SEH research–might offer qualitative researchers a new conceptual framework with which greater interdisciplinarity and impact can be achieved. Two main critical realist claims are introduced: (1) the epistemic fallacy can be avoided by adopting a stratified ontology and judgemental rationality, and (2) social science would benefit from seeking causal explanations underpinned by a transformational model of social activity. By de-coupling interpretive epistemologies from constructivist ontologies, it is argued that critical realism permits greater methodological plurality and hence can help transcend persistent paradigmatic boundaries. Indeed, by adopting a realist social ontology and complex, emergent conception of causality, this paper suggests that critical realism permits and encourages impact by asking researchers to focus on explaining the enduring social relations that produce real-world problems. The paper concludes by pointing out the limitations of critical realism and highlighting other ways that interdisciplinarity and impact can similarly be achieved.",
keywords = "Qualitative, critical realism, impact, interdisciplinarity, methodology, ontology",
author = "Gareth Wiltshire",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "8",
doi = "10.1080/2159676X.2018.1467482",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "525--542",
journal = "Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health",
issn = "2159-676X",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A case for critical realism in the pursuit of interdisciplinarity and impact

AU - Wiltshire, Gareth

PY - 2018/5/8

Y1 - 2018/5/8

N2 - In recent years, much social scientific scholarship in sport, exercise and health (SEH) has repudiated (post) positivist research and has instead persuasively argued in favour of qualitative research from constructivist–interpretivist paradigmatic approaches. While this scholarship has enriched the field in numerous ways, this paper contends that constructivist–interpretivist assumptions elicit a modus operandi which is inimical to the accomplishment of two associated contemporary research agendas: interdisciplinarity and impact. In seeking an alternative philosophy of science, the purpose of this paper is to explore how critical realism–meta-theoretical position that has been somewhat absent to date in SEH research–might offer qualitative researchers a new conceptual framework with which greater interdisciplinarity and impact can be achieved. Two main critical realist claims are introduced: (1) the epistemic fallacy can be avoided by adopting a stratified ontology and judgemental rationality, and (2) social science would benefit from seeking causal explanations underpinned by a transformational model of social activity. By de-coupling interpretive epistemologies from constructivist ontologies, it is argued that critical realism permits greater methodological plurality and hence can help transcend persistent paradigmatic boundaries. Indeed, by adopting a realist social ontology and complex, emergent conception of causality, this paper suggests that critical realism permits and encourages impact by asking researchers to focus on explaining the enduring social relations that produce real-world problems. The paper concludes by pointing out the limitations of critical realism and highlighting other ways that interdisciplinarity and impact can similarly be achieved.

AB - In recent years, much social scientific scholarship in sport, exercise and health (SEH) has repudiated (post) positivist research and has instead persuasively argued in favour of qualitative research from constructivist–interpretivist paradigmatic approaches. While this scholarship has enriched the field in numerous ways, this paper contends that constructivist–interpretivist assumptions elicit a modus operandi which is inimical to the accomplishment of two associated contemporary research agendas: interdisciplinarity and impact. In seeking an alternative philosophy of science, the purpose of this paper is to explore how critical realism–meta-theoretical position that has been somewhat absent to date in SEH research–might offer qualitative researchers a new conceptual framework with which greater interdisciplinarity and impact can be achieved. Two main critical realist claims are introduced: (1) the epistemic fallacy can be avoided by adopting a stratified ontology and judgemental rationality, and (2) social science would benefit from seeking causal explanations underpinned by a transformational model of social activity. By de-coupling interpretive epistemologies from constructivist ontologies, it is argued that critical realism permits greater methodological plurality and hence can help transcend persistent paradigmatic boundaries. Indeed, by adopting a realist social ontology and complex, emergent conception of causality, this paper suggests that critical realism permits and encourages impact by asking researchers to focus on explaining the enduring social relations that produce real-world problems. The paper concludes by pointing out the limitations of critical realism and highlighting other ways that interdisciplinarity and impact can similarly be achieved.

KW - Qualitative

KW - critical realism

KW - impact

KW - interdisciplinarity

KW - methodology

KW - ontology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046664747&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/2159676X.2018.1467482

DO - 10.1080/2159676X.2018.1467482

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 525

EP - 542

JO - Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health

T2 - Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health

JF - Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health

SN - 2159-676X

IS - 5

ER -