A bivariate extension of the Hosking and Wallis goodness-of-fit measure for regional distributions

Thomas Kjeldsen, Ilaria Prosdocimi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

21 Citations (SciVal)
229 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This study presents a bivariate extension of the goodness-of-fit measure for regional frequency distributions developed by Hosking and Wallis [1993] for use with the method of L-moments. Utilising the approximate joint normal distribution of the regional L-skewness and L-kurtosis, a graphical representation of the confidence region on the L-moment diagram can be constructed as an ellipsoid. Candidate distributions can then be accepted where the corresponding theoretical relationship between the L-skewness and L-kurtosis intersects the confidence region, and the chosen distribution would be the one that minimises the Mahalanobis distance measure. Based on a set of Monte Carlo simulations it is demonstrated that the new bivariate measure generally selects the true population distribution more frequently than the original method. Results are presented to show that the new measure remains robust when applied to regions where the level of inter-site correlation is at a level found in real world regions. Finally the method is applied to two different case studies involving annual maximum peak flow data from Italian and British catchments to identify suitable regional frequency distributions.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)896-907
Number of pages12
JournalWater Resources Research
Volume51
Issue number2
Early online date29 Dec 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 11 Feb 2015

Bibliographical note

R-code implementing the bivariate Goodness-Of-Fit measure can be downloaded from GitHub:

https://github.com/ilapros/GOFmeas

Keywords

  • hydrology
  • flood frequency estimation
  • Regional flood hydrology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A bivariate extension of the Hosking and Wallis goodness-of-fit measure for regional distributions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this