12-month follow-up after brief interventions in primary care for family members affected by the substance misuse problem of a close relative

R. Velleman, J. Orford, L. Templeton, A. Copello, A. Patel, L. Moore, J. Macleod, C. Godfrey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Following the publication of initial and 3-month data from a prospective cluster randomised comparative trial [Copello, A., Templeton, L., Orford, J., Velleman, R., Patel, A., Moore, L., ...aEuro broken vertical bar , Godfrey, C. (2009). The relative efficacy of two levels of a primary care intervention for family members affected by the addiction problem of a close relative: A randomised trial. Addiction, 104, 49--58.], an opportunistic 12-month follow-up was undertaken. The trial compared two brief interventions for use by primary health care professionals with family members (FMs) affected by the problematic substance use of a close relative. Ninety out of 143 (63%%) FMs in the trial were followed up at 12 months. Three validated self-completion questionnaires were re-administered: Symptom Rating Test, Coping Questionnaire and Family Member Impact Scale. At 12 months there were still no significant differences between FMs depending on which of the two brief interventions received. The initial improvements at 12 weeks on all of the measures (symptoms, coping and impact) were maintained, and further improved (FMs reported that their symptoms, their coping behaviours and the impact on them of their relatives'' substance misuse problem all continued to reduce). These improvements were unrelated to a range of demographic variables. FMs also reported a gradual improvement in their relatives'' misusing behaviour over the three time periods. In conclusion, following a brief intervention for affected FMs, either delivered in full via professional intervention or via a self-help manual following a brief introduction from a professional, both groups improve equally; there are significant and positive changes which are both maintained and further increased over a 12-month period, without any further formal delivery of the intervention.
LanguageEnglish
Pages362-374
Number of pages13
JournalAddiction Research & Theory
Volume19
Issue number4
DOIs
StatusPublished - 2011

Fingerprint

Primary Health Care
Psychological Adaptation
Publications
Demography

Keywords

  • primary care
  • 12-month follow-up
  • randomised trial
  • stress
  • coping and symptoms
  • family members
  • alcohol and drug problems

Cite this

12-month follow-up after brief interventions in primary care for family members affected by the substance misuse problem of a close relative. / Velleman, R.; Orford, J.; Templeton, L.; Copello, A.; Patel, A.; Moore, L.; Macleod, J.; Godfrey, C.

In: Addiction Research & Theory, Vol. 19, No. 4, 2011, p. 362-374.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0c65942a64974afe992fb2f6e87682f3,
title = "12-month follow-up after brief interventions in primary care for family members affected by the substance misuse problem of a close relative",
abstract = "Following the publication of initial and 3-month data from a prospective cluster randomised comparative trial [Copello, A., Templeton, L., Orford, J., Velleman, R., Patel, A., Moore, L., ...aEuro broken vertical bar , Godfrey, C. (2009). The relative efficacy of two levels of a primary care intervention for family members affected by the addiction problem of a close relative: A randomised trial. Addiction, 104, 49--58.], an opportunistic 12-month follow-up was undertaken. The trial compared two brief interventions for use by primary health care professionals with family members (FMs) affected by the problematic substance use of a close relative. Ninety out of 143 (63{\%}{\%}) FMs in the trial were followed up at 12 months. Three validated self-completion questionnaires were re-administered: Symptom Rating Test, Coping Questionnaire and Family Member Impact Scale. At 12 months there were still no significant differences between FMs depending on which of the two brief interventions received. The initial improvements at 12 weeks on all of the measures (symptoms, coping and impact) were maintained, and further improved (FMs reported that their symptoms, their coping behaviours and the impact on them of their relatives'' substance misuse problem all continued to reduce). These improvements were unrelated to a range of demographic variables. FMs also reported a gradual improvement in their relatives'' misusing behaviour over the three time periods. In conclusion, following a brief intervention for affected FMs, either delivered in full via professional intervention or via a self-help manual following a brief introduction from a professional, both groups improve equally; there are significant and positive changes which are both maintained and further increased over a 12-month period, without any further formal delivery of the intervention.",
keywords = "primary care, 12-month follow-up, randomised trial, stress, coping and symptoms, family members, alcohol and drug problems",
author = "R. Velleman and J. Orford and L. Templeton and A. Copello and A. Patel and L. Moore and J. Macleod and C. Godfrey",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.3109/16066359.2011.564691",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "362--374",
journal = "Addiction Research & Theory",
issn = "1606-6359",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - 12-month follow-up after brief interventions in primary care for family members affected by the substance misuse problem of a close relative

AU - Velleman, R.

AU - Orford, J.

AU - Templeton, L.

AU - Copello, A.

AU - Patel, A.

AU - Moore, L.

AU - Macleod, J.

AU - Godfrey, C.

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Following the publication of initial and 3-month data from a prospective cluster randomised comparative trial [Copello, A., Templeton, L., Orford, J., Velleman, R., Patel, A., Moore, L., ...aEuro broken vertical bar , Godfrey, C. (2009). The relative efficacy of two levels of a primary care intervention for family members affected by the addiction problem of a close relative: A randomised trial. Addiction, 104, 49--58.], an opportunistic 12-month follow-up was undertaken. The trial compared two brief interventions for use by primary health care professionals with family members (FMs) affected by the problematic substance use of a close relative. Ninety out of 143 (63%%) FMs in the trial were followed up at 12 months. Three validated self-completion questionnaires were re-administered: Symptom Rating Test, Coping Questionnaire and Family Member Impact Scale. At 12 months there were still no significant differences between FMs depending on which of the two brief interventions received. The initial improvements at 12 weeks on all of the measures (symptoms, coping and impact) were maintained, and further improved (FMs reported that their symptoms, their coping behaviours and the impact on them of their relatives'' substance misuse problem all continued to reduce). These improvements were unrelated to a range of demographic variables. FMs also reported a gradual improvement in their relatives'' misusing behaviour over the three time periods. In conclusion, following a brief intervention for affected FMs, either delivered in full via professional intervention or via a self-help manual following a brief introduction from a professional, both groups improve equally; there are significant and positive changes which are both maintained and further increased over a 12-month period, without any further formal delivery of the intervention.

AB - Following the publication of initial and 3-month data from a prospective cluster randomised comparative trial [Copello, A., Templeton, L., Orford, J., Velleman, R., Patel, A., Moore, L., ...aEuro broken vertical bar , Godfrey, C. (2009). The relative efficacy of two levels of a primary care intervention for family members affected by the addiction problem of a close relative: A randomised trial. Addiction, 104, 49--58.], an opportunistic 12-month follow-up was undertaken. The trial compared two brief interventions for use by primary health care professionals with family members (FMs) affected by the problematic substance use of a close relative. Ninety out of 143 (63%%) FMs in the trial were followed up at 12 months. Three validated self-completion questionnaires were re-administered: Symptom Rating Test, Coping Questionnaire and Family Member Impact Scale. At 12 months there were still no significant differences between FMs depending on which of the two brief interventions received. The initial improvements at 12 weeks on all of the measures (symptoms, coping and impact) were maintained, and further improved (FMs reported that their symptoms, their coping behaviours and the impact on them of their relatives'' substance misuse problem all continued to reduce). These improvements were unrelated to a range of demographic variables. FMs also reported a gradual improvement in their relatives'' misusing behaviour over the three time periods. In conclusion, following a brief intervention for affected FMs, either delivered in full via professional intervention or via a self-help manual following a brief introduction from a professional, both groups improve equally; there are significant and positive changes which are both maintained and further increased over a 12-month period, without any further formal delivery of the intervention.

KW - primary care

KW - 12-month follow-up

KW - randomised trial

KW - stress

KW - coping and symptoms

KW - family members

KW - alcohol and drug problems

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79959387970&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/16066359.2011.564691

U2 - 10.3109/16066359.2011.564691

DO - 10.3109/16066359.2011.564691

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 362

EP - 374

JO - Addiction Research & Theory

T2 - Addiction Research & Theory

JF - Addiction Research & Theory

SN - 1606-6359

IS - 4

ER -