Description
Event recording: https://vimeo.com/1188055721/b536509688?fl=pl&fe=vlPalliative Incubator Event
The Value of a Sociological Perspective on Palliative Care In conversation with Dr Diana Teggi and Professor Kate Woodthorpe University of Bath, Centre for Death and Society (CDAS)
Join us for a conversation between two sociologists from the Centre for Death and Society (Kate and Diana) about the benefits of adopting a social science perspective to study palliative and end of life care. Disciplines shape the questions researchers ask and, ultimately, the kinds of knowledge they produce. Sociology is uniquely positioned to interrogate issues of power and researcher involvement in the research process, and the normativities that both sustain.
Who is the audience:
- Anyone wishing to build their research skills in Palliative and End of Life Care Research
You’ll get an insight into:
- How a sociological perspective differs from a medical or health service perspective on palliative care.
- The main concerns of a sociological perspectives on dying and its care
- How a sociological perspective might benefit your research project
| Period | 11 Mar 2026 |
|---|---|
| Held at | Palliative Care Incubator, UK United Kingdom |
| Degree of Recognition | National |
Keywords
- palliative care
- sociology
- end of life care
- anthropology
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Health(social science)
- Anthropology
Related content
-
Projects
-
Dying at home
Project: Research council
-
Research output
-
Demographic, Health, and Social Predictors of Place of Death in England, 2004-2013: Identifying barriers to dying in the community
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
-
Care homes as hospices for the prevalent form of dying: An analysis of long-term care provision towards the end of life in England
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
-
Unexpected death in ill old age: An analysis of disadvantaged dying in the English old population
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review